Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: 300?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    SE South Dakota
    Posts
    71
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts

    300?

    Hello there all, new to the fourm and I must say it looks like a good bunch of people here!

    I have a question for you, I am looking at getting a new rifle for Mule Deer/Elk and have my caliber choice down to either 300 WinMag or 300 WSM.

    Which one would you choose and why?

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Anderson, CA
    Posts
    189
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    300 win mag, there are many reasons but the main ones are:

    Popular cartridge anywhere, you can find ammo for it anywhere that sells ammo

    It's a proven cartridge, it's been around a long time and is very popular for a reason

    Less recoil, all the WSM have much more recoil than their brother cartridge.

    Ballistics are pretty close yet the 300 win mag is cheaper to shoot

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Reno, Nevada, United States
    Posts
    2,107
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked 154 Times in 116 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 3 Times in 2 Posts
    Also 300 win mag isnt as fat so magazines hold more.
    My uncle has a 300 wsm in rem 700 and I believe it holds 3+1

    While a 300 win. Holds 4+1.

    Might not make a difference in your decision but maybe.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    47
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    +1 to both of those responses. The fat case and steep shoulder on the wsm's also makes for a rougher cycle. I have a Kimber Montana with no floor plate so you have to cycle all the cartridges to empty the magazine. After a few loads/unloads the brass gets deep scratches. Other guns may not have that problem, but mine does...

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    2,169
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 310 Times in 237 Posts
    Congratulations
    2
    Congratulated 3 Times in 1 Post
    I think the two cartridges are more similar than different. In my experience, the 300 WSM is pretty widely available, anymore. Both are excellent handloading cartridges. I would make the choice based on the action you prefer: short or long.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    TriCountyNM
    Posts
    431
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 13 Times in 2 Posts
    i agree with bitterroot. I would add loading your own ammo, I had a 300 wsm and wasn't too happy with it, but from what i've heard, with custom loaded ammo they perform alot better, i only used ammo off the shelf. Took more animals than not but lost a couple due to the bullet not hitting hard enough. Seemed like it would just pierce a small whole and slip right thru without mushrooming. After about 50 yards they would close up and were untrackable and would keep going and going and going. The ones i did harvest, had the same small hole but a better placed shot. Not proud of it, but it happens, hopefully you have better luck with it than i did.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    TriCountyNM
    Posts
    431
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 13 Times in 2 Posts
    they sure are showing some killer shows on the Outdoor Channel and Sportsmans Channel tonight!!!!

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    964
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 49 Times in 39 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 21 Times in 1 Post
    I don't know what jay means by "not hitting hard enough" but that's certainly not the caliber's fault. Sounds like a crappy bullet.

    The ballistics between the two are so close, it just comes down to what bullet you want to shoot. If you want to launch heavier bullets, 180-210+ gr., go with the winchester. If you are thinking of going lighter, 150-180 gr., the short mag will do that very well.

    The 300 win. is legendary and that's what I would choose, but it should also be noted that your rifle will be lighter on a short action. Just depends on what you're looking for and your personal preference. You really can't go wrong with either one.
    Arise... Kill, Eat! - Acts 10:13

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    TriCountyNM
    Posts
    431
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 13 Times in 2 Posts
    [QUOTE=Elkoholic307;13558]I don't know what jay means by "not hitting hard enough" but that's certainly not the caliber's fault. Sounds like a crappy bullet.

    I think I noted I was using "crappy bullets", thanks for the recap!

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Joseph Or
    Posts
    247
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I can't speak about the wsm because I have never shot one, but my 300 win mag has 6 consecutive one shot kills!
    NRA Life Member OHA Life Member
    Hunter for Life

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •