Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Allegan, MI
    Posts
    1,250
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 337 Times in 254 Posts
    Congratulations
    44
    Congratulated 47 Times in 8 Posts

    Great Lakes Wolves Back On ESA List

    By John Flesher, Associated Press5:52 p.m. EST December 19, 2014

    TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. — A federal judge on Friday threw out an Obama administration decision to remove the gray wolf population in the western Great Lakes region from the endangered species list — a decision that will ban further wolf hunting and trapping in three states.

    The order affects wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin, where the combined population is estimated at around 3,700. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service dropped federal protections from those wolves in 2012 and handed over management to the states.

    U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., ruled Friday the removal was “arbitrary and capricious” and violated the federal Endangered Species Act.

    Unless overturned, her decision will block the states from scheduling additional hunting and trapping seasons for the predators. All three have had at least one hunting season since protections were lifted, while Minnesota and Wisconsin also have allowed trapping.

    More than 1,500 Great Lakes wolves have been killed since federal protections were removed, said Jonathan Lovvorn, senior vice president of the Humane Society of the United States, which filed a lawsuit that prompted Howell’s ruling.

    “We are pleased that the court has recognized that the basis for the delisting decision was flawed, and would stop wolf recovery in its tracks,” Lovvorn said.



    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman Gavin Shire said the agency was disappointed and would confer with the U.S. Department of Justice and the states about whether to appeal.

    “The science clearly shows that wolves are recovered in the Great Lakes region, and we believe the Great Lakes states have clearly demonstrated their ability to effectively manage their wolf populations,” Shire said. “This is a significant step backward.”

    Wolf advocates applauded the ruling Friday.

    “We filed the lawsuit to relist the Great Lakes population of wolves,” said Jill Fritz, coordinator of Michigan’s Humane Society of the United States. “It was based on the assertion that the Great Lakes states had proven they could not responsibly manage wolves when they were delisted in January 2012.”

    Jodi Habush Sinykin, an attorney for Midwest Environmental Advocates, which supports science-based wildlife management, said the decision should serve as a clear signal of caution to people who would destroy the nation’s wolves.

    Minnesota Natural Resources Commissioner Tom Landwehr said agency attorneys will study the ruling before determining its effect on state wolf policy.

    “On face value we’re very surprised. We didn’t even know it was coming to a conclusion here,” Landwehr said. “It’s an unusual turn of events.”

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Topgun 30-06 For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    592
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 20 Times in 5 Posts
    What a crock!

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    colfax, wa
    Posts
    5,222
    Thanks
    1,281
    Thanked 667 Times in 572 Posts
    Congratulations
    199
    Congratulated 24 Times in 11 Posts
    Is this the same DC judge that relisted wolves in WY? What a bunch of BULL! They will be after MT and ID next......
    "Now two flags fly above my land that really sum up how I fee. One is the colors that fly high and proud The red, the white, the blue. The other one's got a rattlesnake With a simple statement made "Don't tread on me" is what it says and I'll take that to my grave. Because this is me. I'm proud to be American and strong in my beliefs. And I've said it before but I'll say it again 'Cause my family's always fought and died to save this land. And a country boy is all I'll ever be."

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    592
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 20 Times in 5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Musket Man View Post
    Is this the same DC judge that relisted wolves in WY? What a bunch of BULL! They will be after MT and ID next......

    What did they ever decide for sure in Wyoming?

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Gillette, WY
    Posts
    516
    Thanks
    425
    Thanked 148 Times in 125 Posts
    Congratulations
    144
    Congratulated 2 Times in 2 Posts
    The judge in the Wyoming case was Judge Amy Berman Jackson. 3700 wolves? Holy crap! I don't understand this "science based" phrase. Well, good job keeping us informed TG.

    Mnhoundman, it was a pretty similar decision in Wyoming, no hunting or trapping.
    Last edited by Againstthewind; 12-19-2014 at 10:24 PM.

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Allegan, MI
    Posts
    1,250
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 337 Times in 254 Posts
    Congratulations
    44
    Congratulated 47 Times in 8 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Musket Man View Post
    Is this the same DC judge that relisted wolves in WY? What a bunch of BULL! They will be after MT and ID next......
    Nope! They found another Lib Judge to screw us over again and your last statement may not be that far off the way these antis have millions of dollars to spend and there is always a Judge somewhere that will come up with the ruling they're looking for. This one was U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., who ruled Friday the removal was “arbitrary and capricious” and violated the federal Endangered Species Act.

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Michigan's Upper Penninsula. South central in Delta Count bordering Menominee County.
    Posts
    65
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 2 Times in 1 Post
    Back to SSS

  9. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Northern Wisconsin
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    "WORDS OF WISDOM" A northern WI beef farmer once told me when I was hunting yotes on his property - Don't even tell yourself you made a "MISTAKE" on one of those big hybrids, but if he's wearing a collar and you turn into me I have a big bottle of CROWN for ya

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    560
    Thanks
    375
    Thanked 79 Times in 65 Posts
    Congratulations
    2
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Topgun 30-06 View Post
    Nope! They found another Lib Judge to screw us over again and your last statement may not be that far off the way these antis have millions of dollars to spend and there is always a Judge somewhere that will come up with the ruling they're looking for. This one was U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., who ruled Friday the removal was “arbitrary and capricious” and violated the federal Endangered Species Act.
    Right on the money TopGun, Did you notice that all these liberal, bunny-hugging Judges they find to rule in their favor are from the EAST coast? Always, they cherry-pick Judges based on past rulings. This really sucks. I was planning a wolf hunt in the next year or two....cleverly disguised as an Elk hunt! The Judge in the Wyoming case has probably never been here. Perhaps she flew over Wyoming in an aircraft once or twice, and that automatically qualifys her as a Wildlife biologist. I think that lawsuits over wildlife issues should be filed in the States affected, NOT in Washington D.C.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 23 Times in 3 Posts
    I was born and raised in northern Wisconsin all my family still resides there. The deer numbers from around Gordon, WI to the big lake are non-existent not that it's prime deer country, but you use to be able to fill tags now a camp of 6 hunting for 6 of the 9 days of rifle in a antlered only area can't even see a buck. Heck 4 of them never seen a deer and the other 2 guys seen a doe and fawn and that's it, but the wolf sign and pictures of them on trail cameras is up ten full. The wolves are the same reason the Wisconsin elk population in the last 10 years has been at about a .1% growth, because every time one elk gets off by itself it's wolf supper.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •