The 264 is coming into it's own with modern powders of the past 5 years and longer barrels.
Any 270 suffers from lack of quality long range bullets. I might have agreed with you in 1960.
As for Jack using the 270, yep he did. And Elmer used various .333, .338, .358, .375, and .411 wildcats. I tend to be an Elmer fan more than a Jack fan.
Jack was also a snob, Elmer was a real person much like the modern day writer Wayne Van Zwoll (Doctor of Wildlife Policy), and by my estimate our best gunwriter.
I am not quite 40, and I wasn't alive for much of either writers career. Jack to me hunted some very interesting species in places like Iran that I may never have the financial wherewithal to do. Elmer was a real cowboy who did 99% of it himself.
I know a couple of men who knew both of them, both of them have hunted more places than either Elmer or Jack, and have fairly ilustrious hunting careers in their own right. Neither one of them thought anyone liked Jack, as much as Jack liked Jack. Everyone I have known that met Elmer Keith liked him immensely. Even when he was at the end of his elk track, and within a few months of death the people that I knew that stopped into his house in Salmn, Idaho to say hello were warmly greeted.
I think Jack saw himself as a writer, who happened to write about the outdoors. In Jack's eyes, he should have been as big of a writer as Ruark or Hemmingway.
Elmer was a gun nut, who liked to write about guns.


Reply With Quote
