Your opinion on Nevada increasing tags

[HuntWYODon]

I don't have "much" stake in the game numbers since I don't reside in NV, but I do have an opinion. Of course I have an opinion, I currently hold points in Nevada, and therefore, I vote no increase. Let the past speak for itself, Nevada is a good "trophy" state, and past administrations working with NVDOW, performed nicely. Don't disrupt a good thing, and keep the hunters coming to Nevada,,,lets say,,,instead of Colorado! Trophy quality keeps em comin' back, not forkies. Keep a good thing goin', and yes, you cannot stockpile game, but it does increase the opportunity to "have" trophy animals available.

You took the words right out of my mouth BB. It's usually all about the revenue ...
I have 7 pts. in their bank also, Just like Az., they take you money every year for years at a time. You have no choice if you are drawn and it's a bad year to be deer hunting. Only what you hear the year before. $$$

[velvetfvr]

I have a theory on it but am not sure if I want to share it though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Wild Country]

I hope for you Nevada residents they do drop the tag allotment the next year. And I hope the powers that be don't fall in love with the revenue because you could be on the fast track to being Oregon just like Colorado. Just my two cents.

[Ikeepitcold]

I have a theory on it but am not sure if I want to share it though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bring it on. Don't hold back we know you want too

[CrimsonArrow]

I've never hunted Nevada, and probably will never get the chance, but it's stupid to mess with a good thing. In 2 states I've seen the damage caused by giving out too many tags. Everybody's happy for a couple years, but then nobody's happy for a long time while the herd rebuilds.

[velvetfvr]

Bring it on. Don't hold back we know you want too

I am not sure but I think it can be true. Ok this increase was a 1 year deal so far. Well I am thinking by them increasing the tags they got rid of almost everyone's bonus points. I am thinking it was a way to clear all of the bonus points because it has to be hard keeping track of all those people and points. Not sure if true but I think I makes perfect sense to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Shooter]

I don't think it's to hard for a computer to keep track of bonus points.

[Ikeepitcold]

I've never hunted Nevada, and probably will never get the chance, but it's stupid to mess with a good thing. In 2 states I've seen the damage caused by giving out too many tags. Everybody's happy for a couple years, but then nobody's happy for a long time while the herd rebuilds.

Idaho!!!! That all I have to say about that.

[Ikeepitcold]

I am not sure but I think it can be true. Ok this increase was a 1 year deal so far. Well I am thinking by them increasing the tags they got rid of almost everyone's bonus points. I am thinking it was a way to clear all of the bonus points because it has to be hard keeping track of all those people and points. Not sure if true but I think I makes perfect sense to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hummmmmmmm.............

[velvetfvr]

Hummmmmmmm.............

What do you think? Now your turn to talk!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk