Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    2,155
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 302 Times in 232 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    That is the Chargemaster Combo, CC, I love mine too. It does measure by weight though.

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Dolores, Colorado
    Posts
    2,347
    Thanks
    102
    Thanked 327 Times in 255 Posts
    Congratulations
    1
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Yep...by weight. In my experience its the only way to measure smokeless powder. Accurate to 1/10th of a grain and fast. I can see no advantage to using volume to load...except with BP.
    Colorado Cowboy
    Cowboy Action Shooter; Endowment Life Member-NRA
    The Original Rocket Scientist-Retired
    "My Father always considered a walk in the mountains as the equivalent of church going."
    Aldous Huxley

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    2,012
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 130 Times in 95 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Colorado Cowboy View Post
    Yep...by weight. In my experience its the only way to measure smokeless powder. Accurate to 1/10th of a grain and fast. I can see no advantage to using volume to load...except with BP.
    Only advantage is accuracy and time loading my friend

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Dolores, Colorado
    Posts
    2,347
    Thanks
    102
    Thanked 327 Times in 255 Posts
    Congratulations
    1
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Drhorsepower View Post
    Only advantage is accuracy and time loading my friend
    Are you refering to accuracy of the powder charge or accuracy of the loaded round? I have loaded literally tens of 1000's of rounds using each method. While the volume method of powder measurement may be slightly faster, I have found it to be less accurate in the amount of powder you use each time. The is too much variation in the powder granule size of different types of powder to maintain accuracy of the individual charge. In some types of reloading, namely shotgun and most BP, this amount of accuracy is probably not necessary. But in reloading rifle cartridges, I beg to differ. The only way Iget the accuracy I demand is to weigh each and every load down to the 1/10 of a grain. My RCBS allows me to do that. I used to use various brands of powder measures (and still do for pistol), but the variation in the powder drops were too large for my rifle loads....again at least for me and my demands on accurate powder charges down to 1/10 of a grain.

    Everyone has their own way of doing things, this is how I have done it for years and will continue in the future. It doesn't make me right and everyone who doesn't agree with me wrong. I have used both methods in the past and still do for certain applications, but the results I get are exactly what I want.
    Colorado Cowboy
    Cowboy Action Shooter; Endowment Life Member-NRA
    The Original Rocket Scientist-Retired
    "My Father always considered a walk in the mountains as the equivalent of church going."
    Aldous Huxley

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    2,012
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 130 Times in 95 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Cc, I am referring to accuracy of loaded round. One can argue accuracy of powder charge depending on what you are measuring, if you are measuring weight, it is not that accurate, if you are measuring volume, well its fairly accurate. I have not tried all of my loads for my rifles, the ones I have shot show improvement in accuracy. I still have to try my 7mm mag which is not ball powder. I have not even shot that rifle simply because I am not expecting a rifle tag any time soon.

    In my .243 win rem 700, my averaged 3-3 shot groups changed from .562 to .488
    My .17 rem changed from .392 to .377
    .220 swift went from .475 to .422

    It is not for everybody and if what you are doing works for you, keep with it no doubt, for me, accuracy is final and I strive to find the most accurate loads for my weapons. I take it a lot farther than some people and learn from the ones who take it to the extreme.

    Like you, I love reloading, keep up the strong work and keep your knowledge flowing for all of us youngins

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Dolores, Colorado
    Posts
    2,347
    Thanks
    102
    Thanked 327 Times in 255 Posts
    Congratulations
    1
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Hey man...if it works keep doin it! Used to do a lot of 1000 yard bp shooting with my Sharp 45-70. Weighed each and every load, used a drop tube, cast my own bullets, special lube, grease cookies and more. Really got to be not a lot of fun any more, thats why I kinda lost interest and quit shooting it several years ago. Still reload all my BP cowboy loads, a bit more tedious than fun tho. I still enjoy loading smokeless rifle tho and havn't shot any factory loads (that I bought) in over 25 years. Helps to be retired with time to do it.
    Colorado Cowboy
    Cowboy Action Shooter; Endowment Life Member-NRA
    The Original Rocket Scientist-Retired
    "My Father always considered a walk in the mountains as the equivalent of church going."
    Aldous Huxley

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    918
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Back to the 375 Ruger... does anyone here reload for it?
    Arise... Kill, Eat! - Acts 10:13

  8. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Here is what I have for my loads with a 375 Ruger in African. 80.5 of Big Game Remington 9 1/2 primer hornady cases. 74 of Reloader 15 with Federal 215 with hornady cases. Big Game load is right around 2800 fps and the Reloader 15 is running around 2750 fps. Both loads are with 260 nosler accubonds. Shooting between 1" and 1 1/2" three shot groups. The factory ammo with 270 hornady sp shoots arond 2700. So I am having good luck with the round. But the alaskan has 3 1/2" less barrel then the african. You can't expect it to get these speeds even with max loads threw a alaskan. I have shot one elk and two deer with the big game load and of course they dropped everything right on the spot. I really think the gun would shoot even better with a little more work, but the accuracy is plenty for what I intend to use it for. On top of all of that the loads shoot to the same point of impact at 100 yards. So I don't need to adjust the scope if I change loads back and forth. I have even tried it out to 200 yards with my 8" gong and both mass right together on the gong. With the open sights it does hit a little high and to the right at 50 yards but I think the sights are regulated for 300 grain bullets at 50.
    Last edited by boulderbeardog; 08-01-2012 at 05:26 PM.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Does anyone own a Ruger Scout
    By y02MDM in forum Guns, Muzzleloaders and Ammo
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-03-2013, 10:59 AM
  2. Ruger
    By Natree81 in forum Guns, Muzzleloaders and Ammo
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-24-2013, 05:34 PM
  3. 338 ruger 77
    By ivorytip in forum General Hunting
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-21-2012, 11:46 PM
  4. Ruger Contact?
    By MT.MAN in forum Guns, Muzzleloaders and Ammo
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-17-2011, 05:51 PM
  5. Ruger #1 accuracy
    By topdog in forum Guns, Muzzleloaders and Ammo
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-04-2011, 11:25 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •