Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 89
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Rochester, Washington
    Posts
    62
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts

    223 WSSM for Antelope

    Wondering if anyone knows the legality of the 223 WSSM for antelope in Wyoming. I read the rule and know it's legal with a 60 grain or heavier bullet. But what if I want to use a 50 or 55 grain? If I'm reading the rule correctly, it would still be legal because it meets the 500 foot pounds of energy requirement. But does anybody know for sure?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails image.jpg  
    Last edited by bdan68; 05-07-2014 at 10:12 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Eastern Nebraska
    Posts
    731
    Thanks
    462
    Thanked 232 Times in 168 Posts
    Congratulations
    51
    Congratulated 8 Times in 3 Posts
    Yes the 223WSSM is legal. It is significantly over the needed foot pounds of energy at 100 yards. It would not be my first selection to take on an antelope hunt but I'm sure it would work. If you do decide to take it, practice in the wind so you understand how much bullet drift you will have. I would also limit your shots to 250 yards due to the loss in energy beyond that range. Just my 2 cents... .243 is my personal minimum for antelope.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    616
    Thanks
    123
    Thanked 174 Times in 140 Posts
    Congratulations
    54
    Congratulated 5 Times in 2 Posts
    The way I interpret it, the round has to meet all of the requirements for rifle. I think the energy requirement is geared towards pistol rounds.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Rochester, Washington
    Posts
    62
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I'm also bringing my 270 but with 4 doe tags for antelope, I thought it might be fun to try to take at least one animal with the 223.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Eastern Nebraska
    Posts
    731
    Thanks
    462
    Thanked 232 Times in 168 Posts
    Congratulations
    51
    Congratulated 8 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by libidilatimmy View Post
    The way I interpret it, the round has to meet all of the requirements for rifle. I think the energy requirement is geared towards pistol rounds.
    They changed their description to allow for different calibers. Since it now say "or", instead of "and", at the start of each phrase, you just have to meet one of the criteria to be legal.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    616
    Thanks
    123
    Thanked 174 Times in 140 Posts
    Congratulations
    54
    Congratulated 5 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hilltop View Post
    They changed their description to allow for different calibers. Since it now say "or", instead of "and", at the start of each phrase, you just have to meet one of the criteria to be legal.
    I would definitely call a warden to make sure on this so you don't get a ticket. It was my understanding that the cartridge had to be at least 22 cal AND have a 60 grain soft point expandable projectile (no FMJ rounds) for the new "AR" rule, but I could be mistaken

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    colfax, wa
    Posts
    4,978
    Thanks
    1,163
    Thanked 595 Times in 521 Posts
    Congratulations
    49
    Congratulated 17 Times in 8 Posts
    IMO it is somewhat unclear the way it is worded and could be interpreted a few different ways. There was a thread a while back that we debated it a bit and Im not sure we all ever agreed on how to interpret the regs.
    Keystone 1, Over!

    " I am lost in the dust of the chase that my life brings"

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Rochester, Washington
    Posts
    62
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Okay, I guess I need to call a game warden to be sure.

    But even then, what if that particular game warden gives me the wrong answer?


    Does everyone agree that it definitely would be legal with a 60 grain or heavier bullet?

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    colfax, wa
    Posts
    4,978
    Thanks
    1,163
    Thanked 595 Times in 521 Posts
    Congratulations
    49
    Congratulated 17 Times in 8 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bdan68 View Post
    Okay, I guess I need to call a game warden to be sure.

    But even then, what if that particular game warden gives me the wrong answer?


    Does everyone agree that it definitely would be legal with a 60 grain or heavier bullet?
    Im sure it is legal with a 60gr + bullet. To me it reads aslong as it has 500 pounds of energy its legal, but I would feel alot better meeting the cal and bullet weight minimum too.
    Keystone 1, Over!

    " I am lost in the dust of the chase that my life brings"

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Black Hills, Wy
    Posts
    174
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Asked a game warden about this and he said its in the gray area. Meaning it kinda depends on the wardens discretion!!!

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •