Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    missouri
    Posts
    98
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts

    8x or 10x? Binocs

    Looking at the zen ray ed3. Should I go with the 8x or 10x? The money difference is only $10. Mainly use them antelope hunting and deer hunting here at home. Maybe an elk trip if I can ever get one tied up. Lol. Also does anyone use the zen rays?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    576
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked 160 Times in 128 Posts
    Congratulations
    21
    Congratulated 1 Time in 1 Post
    Although I've never used the Zen Ray's, I prefer 10x binos for all around use. The 8x always seemed like they had me reaching for the spotting scope where the 10x serve my glassing needs 80% of the time. It may make a difference between the two based on the distances you will typically be glassing where field of view at closer ranges might out weigh the extra magnification.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    KC Missouri
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 1 Time in 1 Post
    I have 7x Leica's and I would prefer to have 10x for antelope hunting out west. I also carry a spotting scope, so the 7x Bino's are okay. I also use my Leica's for deer hunting in Missouri, so the 7x are a good compromise for both species. I would not want to use 10x for deer hunting in Missouri. A lot of my deer are spotted coming out into fields very late in the day with minimal light.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Jim Bridger County, Utah
    Posts
    1,125
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked 188 Times in 137 Posts
    Congratulations
    4
    Congratulated 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Out west they say nothing smaller than 10x but I've found that looking free hand 8's are far easier for me to stabilize without a tripod. I'd go with 8's period, wished I could sale my 10x Geovid HD-b's and get some 8's!
    TICK
    TALL, WIDE and HANDSOME

  5. #5
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Reno Nv
    Posts
    4,087
    Thanks
    821
    Thanked 531 Times in 371 Posts
    Congratulations
    32
    Congratulated 6 Times in 5 Posts
    10x for sure
    I don't Break the rules, I Modify them.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Oregon Coast
    Posts
    614
    Thanks
    238
    Thanked 117 Times in 96 Posts
    Congratulations
    7
    Congratulated 1 Time in 1 Post
    Comes down to personal preference and to a certain degree the quality of the glass.
    Some 8X glass is better than some 10X glass.

    I only use my 8X for bow and tree stand hunting (when I was WT hunting back east).
    For just about all the hunting out west (except maybe the tangled thick stuff here on the OR/WA coast) 10X would be the better choice IMO.
    Life member RMEF
    Mathews DXT, Bowtech Admiral, Browing .300WSM...... and Swarovski Optiks my wife doesn't know about.
    1999 Washington Blacktaill, Bear River GMU, nontypical 6X7

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to OregonJim For This Useful Post:


  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Peoples Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    356
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 52 Times in 40 Posts
    Congratulations
    1
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    In comparable quality glass, I would go with 10X, but no higher in a binocular, as they are too hard to hold steady without a tripod, etc.. I have a pair of Swarovski 8X, and a pair of Kahles 10X. I have not used the Swarovski in a few years.
    Patron Life Member, NRA; Life Member RMEF, SCI, NAHHC, NSRPA

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    445
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 84 Times in 47 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    10X without a doubt. Then again, Jack O'Connor did pretty well and he always used 8X but he didn't have the modern glass coatings.

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    North Umpqua River, Oregon
    Posts
    2,245
    Thanks
    348
    Thanked 466 Times in 288 Posts
    Congratulations
    11
    Congratulated 7 Times in 5 Posts
    I'd say just compromise and go with the 9X
    Grand Slam #1005 + 2: Dall (1986 Yukon), Fannin/Stone (1987 Yukon), Bighorn (1988 Colorado Unit S-26), Stone (1995 British Columbia), Desert (2001 Nevada Unit 161), Bighorn (2009 Wyoming Unit 5)

  11. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    92
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 1 Time in 1 Post
    I have both the 87 and 10x.
    Of The two, for western hunting, I prefer the 10x.

    Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •